Dr Dancebelt is correct. Most guys will find that the structure of the dancebelt will conceal the up-pointed erection.
But what I don't understand is the concern about an ererction. I mean, it happens. Everybody knows this fact. And dancewear is designed to see the male anatomy, either for the benefits of structuring the male body in dance, or for the way the male body reacts in performance.
I've been up all night. Aboout three in the morning I watched "Staying Alive," the John Travolta movie I've seen about a dozen times. In the last 30 minutes John proves to be a better dancer than his rival, Butler, for the lead in the Broadway production. At one point at the rehersals, Butler, in a tank-top body suit, appears to have an ererction as he flubs with the girl. But I wonder who cares. I didn't. It was a casual observation on my point.
Guys get erections. Yeah, we know that. Dancewear shows more that most clothing. Yeah, we know that. Male dancers are guys like any guy who get erections in dancewear. Yeah, so what.
The idea in class is to dance. The masculine may be evident, and guess what, that's what makes male dancers different than females. The male body dances in one way, and the females in another way. The observer, or the audience, expect to see the difference. So just do it, and forget how some body parts react.
balletboy[/i]