 Male dancewear
geschrieben von Dancing Fool               am 20.01. um 04:35:15 - als Antwort auf: Re: Footed leggings vs. tights von Tom at>addition to tights, or instead of tights? If it's instead,>maybe they're trying to reach a wider market, the way Wolford's>did when they dubbed their men's tights "waist socks." If in>addition, I wonder what the difference is.>Tom Tom, I'm not familiar with these other products you mention, but the Riversedge website sells both BT tights AND footed leggings. There is one difference between the BT tights and footed leggings - the leggings are available in longer lengths than the tights, which is a great attraction to me (6'5"). Because BT tights just barely fit me, and not very comfortably, I switched to Stevens. Now I'm even more happily switching back, because I prefer the BT cotton/lycra blend to the Stevens' "Milliskin," (whatever that is). Also, I never liked the shiny appearance of Milliskin, whereas the BT tights/footed leggings has your standard matte black color. Antworten zu diesem Beitrag: |
